Testing Workers Safety Gear

Many industries across the United States require workers to abide by certain safety standards set by the Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA), often including basic safety gear. There are multiple different sets of safety gear that are differentiated based on the line of work employees are undertaking. These standards were developed to prevent serious injury and reduce the risk of any incidents while on an active job site. 

The kind of gear and duration of use is constantly modified to better fit the needs of employees and their environment. OSHA and other committees set out to test the gear to understand how they respond to real world situations, and if they comply with the American National Standards Institute (ANSI).

Types of Protective Gear

There are many different types of protective safety gear utilized by the general workforce in the United States. The purpose of utilizing safety gear while at work is to minimize workplace injuries, protect employee health, and promote healthy work environments. The most common gear observed in the field include, but are not limited to:

• Gloves

• Respirator

• Helmet

• Hearing protection

• Hard hat

• Goggles

• Eye protection

• Face shield

• Ear plugs

These types of protective wear otherwise known as PPE (personal protective equipment) were continuously developed in response to dangerous work environments where employees are interacting with chemical, radiological, physical, electrical, mechanical, and other unique hazards. The different types of PPE is completely dependent on the type of work being conducted and the risk to the employee. 

All PPE used in a work environment should also be maintained and clean in a reliable fashion to ensure its performance will be effective. All workplaces should have a system in place to source safely designed and constructed equipment that fits the employees comfortably and to encourage their use in the workplace. If the PPE does not fit properly workers are less likely to consistently choose to utilize them, increasing the risk of engaging in dangerous or exposed activities. Like all workplace duties, the use of specific PPE must be trained and there are a multitude of different online and in person resources available. Specific criteria included in the worker training programs requires users to understand wearing PPE:

• When it is necessary to source PPE.

• The type of PPE necessary.

• How to properly wear, remove, and adjust equipment.

• The limitations and effectiveness of certain PPE.

• The proper care, maintenance, lifespan, and disposal procedures for the PPE.

Testing PPE Effectiveness

Many different committees surrounding PPE have developed their own unique tests applicable to types of equipment to assess their usefulness and construction when used in the workplace. All PPE advertised by OSHA pass the ANSI standards, however there are additional tests done to ensure their application is necessary and effective in real world simulations. 

Many of the tests completed by committees are to study the way PPE responds when in motion. These tests are vital because they simulate real world situations when workers are climbing, walking on a site, or in motion in the event of an accident. Plenty of tests are run during the construction process of PPE to ensure their stability and durability in the face of exposure or collision. 

The most important tests that PPE is run through include their effectiveness when under different kinds of stresses. Most employers have working conditions that deal with at least one of these conditions, if not all of them. Some employees undergo working conditions that replicate all five tests on the same job. 

5 General Tests:

1. Ascent

2. Descent

3. Load bearing

4. Load bearing under stress

5. Friction

When ascending PPE needs to protect the worker from overhead dangers like spills, falls, and miscellaneous contusions. On the descent tests, PPE is analyzed in scenarios that replicate falls and rapid downward altitude changes. The descent test is incredibly vital in types of constructive work that involves large amounts of climbing and transporting materials from different levels. The load bearing test seeks to establish the stability of different PPE when a worker or equipment is suspended in place. Labs simulate load bearing under stress by adding swinging or momentum into the PPE test trial. The final test for PPE before deciding its credibility among employers is a friction test, establishing the durability of the equipment when moved between levels at high speeds. The friction test replicates the event of a fall or dropped item on a work site and can be applied to many different forms of PPE. 

Applications for PPE Tests

Many of the tests can be applied to the various PPE used by the industry, and having more than one test is an effective way at determining its durability in a real world environment. These tests not only put workers at ease knowing the equipment they use is in fact safe and effective, but also the employers. Industry leaders want the assurance that the kind of PPE they invest in for their companies is safe, effective, and actually prevents workplace injuries. The other caveat that comes from these tests is changes in the standardizations published by overhead administrations like OSHA and ANSI. If a certain PPE is found to be more or less effective than previously assumed, the standards advertised to employers may have to be entirely modified. These tests also provide clarity into the specific uses individual PPE should be used for, creating more uniform standards and expectations of certain industries. 

Employee Safety Moving to Digital EHS Platforms

Recent reports by the National Safety Council (NSC) suggest environmental, health, and safety (EHS) software can significantly enhance employee safety operations, preventing severe injuries and fatalities while on the job. 

EHS software uses various platforms, mobile applications, and technologies that can be applied to virtually any workplace. The NSC report was released as it continues its Work to Zero initiative designed to eliminate workplace fatalities using technology. 

NSC Work to Zero Initiative 

The National Safety Council decided to employ a Work to Zero Initiative to prevent all workplace fatalities by the year 2050 with new incorporations of various technologies. Thousands of workers continue to die each year in the national workforce prompting experts at the NSC to innovate and solve complicated workplace safety issues. 

Experts agree that with emerging technologies, the thousands of worker fatalities can be eliminated by increasing safety protocols and protecting employees. 

The NSC approach is designed off on three guiding principles:

• Research

• Experts will research and analyze the most effective technologies that can solve workplace safety problems and how those technologies can be implemented in the workplace. 

• Education

• Education on the new technologies and their implementation will be provided to the employees and employer to ensure the correct adaptation and encourage adoption within industries. 

• Partnerships 

• Continue to foster stakeholder partnerships to strengthen everyone’s work, safety, implementation, and protocol. 

The critical importance of partnerships will continue to foster growth and sharing across multiple industries to achieve the zero fatality goal by 2050. With cross-industry communication and sharing, more protocols, technologies, and integration methods will positively impact employees everywhere.

Current advisory boards for the Work to Zero Initiative are actively assessing new technologies for implementation, and many experts agree the way to zero fatalities is through user-friendly mobile applications, software, and safety protocols that can be accessed at the swipe of a finger. Most of the modern workforce has access to mobile devices like cell phones, laptops, and tablets, allowing much greater access to safety technologies than ever before. 

Advantages of Software and Mobile Applications

The National Safety Council has continuously released reports analyzing new technologies and ways they can be implemented for employee safety. Their most recent report, “Managing Risks with EHS Software and Mobile Applications,” built upon earlier reports assessing mapping technologies and solutions for reducing severe workplace injuries and fatalities. 

The new white paper report discovered many advantageous reasons and ways employers can utilize EHS mobile applications and software in their work towards zero by 2050. EHS mobile applications can provide deeper safety insights by helping employees track and monitor their safety compliance while encouraging continually evolving safety procedures as companies change. Mobile delivery of safety information also allows users to be notified when updates are cataloged so they can maintain the most current safety information about their workplace. Having up-to-date delivery of new safety information will allow employers to ensure compliance with mandates and restrictions applied within their industries. 

As more users transfer to mobile software applications to acquire and reference safety materials, the cost savings for overhead expenditures will also decrease. Access and maintenance of these systems can all be completed remotely, reducing company costs and mitigating excess spending involved with employee compensation, recruitment, and illness. The final major benefit of utilizing mobile EHS software will finally allow entire companies to become streamlined in their safety protocols. The EHS software can be accessed by anyone at the company keeping employees, employers, and contractors on the same page regarding specific safety instructions. 

Benefits of EHS Mobile Application Software

• Deeper Safety Insights

• Employers can track, monitor, and evolve safety information by utilizing centralized EHS maintenance system data. 

• Ensure Regulation Compliance

• EHS platforms utilize cloud-based storage allowing users to stay up-to-date on policy modifications, specific safety instructions, and relevant policies. The easy access provided by mobile users will also ensure compliance with safety protocols among users. 

• Cost Savings

• Implementing EHS mobile software will mitigate any excess expenditures associated with employee compensation, recruitment, and illness. 

• Streamlined Policy

• Easy access to EHS software by mobile devices, laptops, and tablets will streamline safety information and provide accurate time safety alerts while in the workplace. 

While implementing new environmental, health, and safety software tools do provide outstanding benefits to the average workplace, several specific instances may conflict within the industry. 

Disadvantages of Software and Mobile Applications

Overarching disadvantages to this type of safety software do bear some difficulties for large industries that require specific customization of their EHS software, and also the limitations of developing any comprehensive EHS protocols that would apply to smaller companies. 

To ensure employees are receiving a sufficient level of technical expertise, they must be able to select software with technical support and resources to operate safely. 

Currently, the EHS software is still in earlier developmental stages, wielding only about an 8 percent adoption of artificial intelligence (A.I.) within their programming. The overwhelming consensus in the utilization aspect of EHS in the workplace by almost 67 percent agree that A.I. should be an integral focus to evolve this technology within the following year. 

After this kind of employee safety technological tool's initial rollouts, the larger industries created highly customized implementation projects to meet their needs. Smaller companies were more likely to select modular implementations that provided standard EHS protocols at a lower cost. The divergence of the two types of industry created some disadvantages as large companies must spend extended amounts of time and money to achieve adequate EHS programs that they can utilize. However, on the other side of the equation, smaller companies are forced to acquire more comprehensive programs that may not precisely fit their company’s needs but come at a more affordable cost.  

Improving EHS Workflow Through Digitization

As the EHS mobile applications and software continue to be improved and implemented across various workplaces and industries, the NSC’s goal is continually chasing zero employee fatalities over the next 25 years. It is encouraging to see many different types of EHS software being hosted by many vendors.

These EHS tools are extremely powerful and, if used correctly, can significantly limit errors, increase data solutions, streamline workflows, and protect employees worldwide.

Human Rights Violations Amidst Qatar World Cup Controversies

This year’s Fifa World Cup will be held on November 20th in Doha, Qatar, and will be the first time in the Middle East. The overall cost of hosting this year’s world cup has been estimated at upwards of $200 billion USD as Qatar has invested in creating seven new stadium venues to host the 32 teams and 64 matches spanning the games. Controversies have plagued the developmental agenda for the Doha world cup since the country began its ambitious construction on the venues 10 years ago. As it draws nearer to completion, many controversies have been at the forefront of media coverage, with allegations of human rights violations and deaths throughout the development process. 

Committing to hosting the Fifa World Cup is a complex request as the event will attract more than 1 million attendees and close to 3 billion virtual spectators. Due to Qatar’s position in the middle east and economic standing, they had to establish all new venues to accommodate the influx of tourists that will arrive later this month. The overhead cost of $200 billion USD has contributed to developing those arenas, ceremonies, workshops, press, housing, and sales. The country has enlisted the help of hundreds of thousands of migrant workers over the last 10 years; however, human rights activists have highlighted the many unsafe conditions, low pay, and faulty system trapping workers in their jobs developing the venues. 

Many migrant workers coming to Qatar are from India, Pakistan, Nepal, and Bangladesh. They were promised substantially increased wages compared to their home countries, although many were unaware of the Qatari employment systems and conditions they would face. The daily life of migrant workers often includes 12 hours of manual labor in temperatures upwards of 100 degrees Fahrenheit. These people were delegated to live in squalid and overcrowded worker camps on the outskirts of developments. The exploitation continued as Qatar is one of the world’s richest per capita countries. It also has many complex employment laws governing its migrant workers. 

A major injustice argued by human rights activists included the highly controversial kafala system whereby migrant workers had to sign away rights to Qatari companies to get a sponsored visa. The sponsors withheld passports, rewrote contracts, and often withheld wages. Employers also required recruitment fees to be paid by workers forcing them into debt with the companies, going months without sending money back to their families in need. Migrants were entirely helpless as the systematic laws also prevented them from leaving the country, changing jobs, or protesting as demonstrating is illegal. 

Immense pressure from the world cup administration and fans resulted in reforming and removing the kafala system towards these migrant workers in 2019. The reformation did improve their working conditions; however, two years later, it is still evident that the weak implementation of the changes still resulted in missing wages, extraneous hours, outrageous recruitment fees, and legal dilemmas for migrant workers. Amnesty groups characterize the workers' condition as a form of modern slavery, with very little rights protection outlined in contracts and virtually no freedom to unionize or gather fair wages in these developments. 
The dangerous conditions have also resulted in tens of thousands of migrant deaths over the last decade in relation to the world cup developments. Many deaths have resulted in outcries from cup supporters and fans who want to see intense reformation in the Qatari facilitation of these people. While some reformations have begun, the weak implementation by officials and lack of resources delegated to the migrant worker has not improved the overall conditions and slavery-type work. The Fifa president and governing body have urged players and fans to focus on football and not to get dragged into the ideological or political battles surrounding the location of the games. Response to their statement has garnered mixed reviews as many amnesty groups condemned the views as hypocrisy and a stark ignorance of these serious human rights issues.

Russia Caught Doping Again at the Winter Olympics

Russian ice skating phenomenon Kamilia Valieva, who recently won team gold, failed a doping test raising concerns about the International Olympic Committee’s accountability toward the Russian athletes and the status of the rest of the Beijing games. 

The 15-year-old Valieva has been an up-and-coming skater at the top of her sport, with credentials like the first woman to ever land the quadruple twisting jump extremely popular in men’s skating events. The controversy over her now failed doping tests has put a magnifying glass on how the IOC handled Russia’s lack of punishment from systematic doping scandals uncovered at the Sochi 2014 winter games. 

Documentaries and inside investigations were published leading up to the Rio de Janeiro 2016 summer games that implicated Russian officials swapping urine samples and attempts to cover the doping. Instead of enacting any form of ban or consequence for the Russian assembly, the IOC abdicated any responsibility granting it to the international overseers of the sports. By abdicating their responsibilities, they have allowed the doping to continue unabated, without the consequence of the Russian Olympic athletes. Lack of reprimands has led to multiple doping infractions by Russian athletes at the 2018 Pyeongchang winter games and now in Beijing. 

Athletes caught doping are persecuted by being stripped of their medals and disqualified from future Olympics. The IOC ‘technically’ banned Russia from the last few games, forcing their athletes to enter under the ”Russian Olympic Committee” using substitutes for their national anthem and uniform colors. The representative Russian athletes are accepted from a registered testing pool that was supposed to eliminate any doping complications, allowing the Russians to compete under the neutral Olympic flag. Obviously, the recent events suggest the lack of consequences for Russia has negatively impacted the credibility of the IOC as officials now have to decide the next steps. 

The drug Valieva tested positive for is called trimetazidine, used as a heart medicine to decrease chest pain. The IOC bans it because it can increase blood flow efficiency and an athlete's endurance, acting like a stimulant and metabolic modulator. The controversy gets even more complicated because Valieva is only 15 and is protected by the World Anti-Doping Code. This means she is treated as a minor with less associated reprimands from testing positive for doping, like only a maximum ban of 2 years. Critics of the IOC suggest the accusations of the 15-year-old intentionally taking the banned substance to improve her performance are laughable, and the actual blame should be placed on the entire Russian system. 

Investigations are underway into the situation, including her coach, Eteri Tutberidze, who has a history of poorly treating her athletes known for putting an immense amount of pressure on the young skaters. The medal ceremony for the team skating event has been postponed indefinitely as the IOC officials and overseers decide how to proceed. The second-place United States and Japan in third were given no reason for the medal ceremony delay until headlines highlighted the positive tests. The decision leading up to the individual skating event Valieva was favored to win, and pending the disqualification, nobody knows how the competitions will go.

The distrust in the process and other ROC athletes will now shroud the competitive ice event with two other Russian skaters planning to make history also attempting quads in their routines.  If the IOC decides to treat Valieva according to the WADC, Russia may keep their team gold, but these games are now tarnished with deceit and doping regardless of the decision. 

Correlation Between Marijuana Legalization and Increased DUIs

Marijuana and the use of Cannabis have long been touted to offer certain health benefits for the immunocompromised and chronically ill, except it is still illegal in most of the world. Countries like the Netherlands, Jamaica, Costa Rica, Spain, and a few others have legalized the sale of recreational marijuana among rising public popularity. The main psychoactive component of cannabis is THC which produces the high sensation and can be inhaled or ingested. Users exposed to THC experience relaxing effects, including heightened sensory perception, euphoria, and an altered perception of time. THC can also be directly ingested, delaying the effects by more than 30 minutes. The effects of cannabis usually last up to 3 hours, although evidence of THC can remain in the body for days after initial use. 

Each person reacts differently to THC ingestion, but increased popularity and legalization around the world have contributed to concerns about its impact on driver safety. In the United States, more than 1.5 million people are arrested for driving under the influence each year. Studies in Colorado suggest an increase of marijuana-related DUIs by more than 48% last year, with an increasing trend over the last five years. The rising frequency DUIs is concerning because a large percentage may correlate with areas that have legalized marijuana. In recent years, the same study also identified increased frequency in marijuana-impaired drivers’ roles in deadly car accidents. 

Assessing impairment from a marijuana user is much harder than in individuals under the influence of alcohol. Despite recent increases in legalization and recreational use of marijuana, law enforcement has yet to identify an accurate and reliable test to determine a driver’s level of intoxication. The equivalent test for alcohol impairment is the breathalyzer test used to determine the blood alcohol content as it corresponds to legal limits. There are blood tests used for THC identification, but they do not provide an accurate assessment of an individual’s level of impairment because of the chemical’s varying effects with each person. New developments in law enforcement have focussed on creating behavioral tests to assess individual impairment, similar to methods used to confirm alcohol intoxication. 

Developing accurate tests is vital for driver’s safety and the ability of law enforcement to assess impaired individuals. Regular marijuana users have produced blood profiles that indicate stores of THC can remain detectable in the blood for 30 days in some cases. These THC levels are often higher than local DUI limits, even though the individual has not recently ingested marijuana. 

Factors impacting DUI statistics include regional THC blood limits, driving laws, past offenses, and law enforcement discretion. The consequences of driving under the influence are also different depending on the region but can implicate an individual up to a year in jail. 

Understanding the use of marijuana as it impacts drivers’ abilities and law enforcement methods for impairment detection are quickly becoming an increasingly vital area of research. Investments will continue to increase as recreational use becomes legalized in other parts of the world.